In the world of the sciences it is hard to tell what are predictions and what is a peek inside the depths of the secret research at top universities, governments or corporations. Generally it is held that top secret technology can lag at least ten years behind what is known to the public. As the article states, the body is merely a computer that can be programed by those who can control the programing language. This is a dangerous door to open, but I fear it most likely is already open.
The field of ‘synthetic biology’ is in its infancy. We can ‘tweak’ the genetics of life forms – but billionaire entrepreneur Craig Venter only created ‘artificial life’ for the first time last year, christening his life form ‘Synthia’.
But experts working within the field believe that our expertise is out-accelerating natural evolution by a factor of millions of years – and some warn that synthetic biology could spin out of control.
It could lead, says Andrew Hessel of Singularity University, on Nasa’s research campus, to a world where hackers could engineer viruses or bacteria to control human minds.
Hessel believes that genetic engineering is the next frontier of computing.
‘This is one of the most powerful technologies in the world,’ says Hessel ‘Synthetic biology – the writing of life.’
‘I advocate that cells are living computers and DNA is a programming language.’
‘I want to see life programmed and used to solve global challenges so that humanity can achieve a sustainable relationship within the biosphere,’ he says.It’s growing fast. It will grow faster than computer technologies.’
He predicts a world where we can ‘print’ DNA, and even ‘decode’ it. But he warned, in a speech at technology conference TXM, that viruses and bacteria send chemicals into human brains – and could be used to influence, or even ‘control’ their host.
A literal virus – injected into a ‘host’ in the guise of a vaccine, say – could be used to control behaviour.
Hessel warns that we ‘may have to learn how to counterattack’ against such weapons.
Security expert Marc Goodman said, ‘Synthetic biology will lead to new forms of bioterrorism,’ and said, ‘Bio-crime today is akin to computer crime in the early Eighties, Few initially recognised the problem – but it grew exponentially.’
When billionaire entrepreneur Craig Venter ‘created life’ last year by adding synthetic DNA to a bacteria cell, Professor Julian Savulescu, an Oxford University ethicist, said: ‘Venter is creaking open the most profound door in humanity’s history, potentially peeking into its destiny.This could be used in the future to make the most powerful bioweapons imaginable. The challenge is to eat the fruit without the worm.’
Hessel, however, is generally optimistic about the future of synthetic biology.
The scientist – who had a vasectomy because he ‘never trusted the process’ of natural reproduction, says, ‘We are going to make synthetic genomes – human genomes. It will make cloning look organic. It will make human reproduction look quaint.’
Computer World blogger Darlene Storm says, ‘I know people who can’t even keep their computers protected, updated and patched – I wonder if they would be more security minded when the hacking could be lethal?’